(no subject)
Jan. 13th, 2007 12:43 pmWell, the New Year is here, and I meant to post this at on the second. However, as ya'll know, I've been hopping around so busy that I can't remember where I left my head. Kisses to co-mod
piksa who saved me with the voting poll last week because I was out of steam and out of time. I put up the new pretty lady to be our muse for a while (not that I still don't want a season of peace), and I just wanted to open a forum to comments about how it's going. We have the issue of what to do with our "graduates" who will soon be earning the Goddess award and how to reward their continued involvement! The grammar voting disappeared, and then reappeared after I got two emails. So, I just want a public spot for comments, suggestions, complaints... whatever!
no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 07:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-14 04:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 10:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-14 12:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-14 04:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-14 05:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-14 05:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-14 05:46 am (UTC)My original thought (which, as I said above, was when we were just starting out) was for goddess level writers, but I think either way would work. Whatever is easiest for you &/or wanted by the comm.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-14 12:17 am (UTC)1. I love the new image and like changing things up every now and again. Just my two cents...
2. (I hope I don't get flamed for this.) I personally like having the option of the grammar vote. I don't use it very often, and I know most people don't use it at all. BUT it's nice to have it there for what I think are relatively obvious reasons. If someone posts a story that has great characterization and a great plot but has awful grammar, I want to reflect that the grammar detracted from my enjoyment of the story. At the same time, I can't in good conscience give a poor vote to characterization or plot, because those elements were great. So, I like having the option.
3. I like meredevachon's (http://meredevachon.livejournal.com) suggestion about awards (above (http://community.livejournal.com/tamingthemuse/133475.html?thread=557923#t557923)). I still don't know if I accurately interpreted it, and I guess we'll have to wait for her to weigh in on that to see. Still, it sounds reasonable. *grins*
no subject
Date: 2007-01-14 04:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-14 05:04 am (UTC)Do we want another ubber award? Something big? Something if you write for 52 weeks maybe?
And yes, this might be more work, but maybe piksa and I can split up the work a little more... I just hate dropping work on other people, so I'll see what she thinks.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-14 08:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-14 03:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-14 05:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-14 05:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-14 07:10 am (UTC)Yes, I would like an uber-big award if I reach 52 weeks...and that's a big if...but that doesn't have to be the answer either...
I'm just willing to let things be the way they are...however the popular vote goes...*wonders if we need a poll*
no subject
Date: 2007-01-14 03:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-15 02:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-14 09:00 am (UTC)Also I would like to ask if we want to arrange the entries in memories too so that you could find certain authors all entries under one heading or all the entries written for a certain prompt? Of course the entries to a certain prompt can be found also by tags.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-14 03:54 pm (UTC)The memories are a great idea... we have the prompts in tags already, but we don't have a way to search by author or by fandom, so those would be awesome. Do you want to play with that, or we could put out a call for another moderator and split the work up... have one person go back through archives and put in memories by fandom and someone else go through by author and someone else by prompt... whatever works for you.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-14 05:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-14 05:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-14 11:29 pm (UTC)Also, if you decide you need some more help, I'd be happy to pitch in.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-14 10:28 am (UTC)Also, thank you to Piksa, for taking some of the strain, because it is a lot of work and I'm sure I speak for everyone in recognising how much you both do for us all.
I read all the comments posted before this one and love the ideas presented. If I may summarise my opinion, it would be -
At 30 weeks, you get a Goddess Award. That is given without having to take a week off.
After that, the awards become Goddess-[muse name], but you shouldn't be able to cash them in until you get to the last muse, ie Goddess-Urania at 57 weeks. Once you get to 58 weeks, you've got Goddess and Goddess-Urania and you start back working for Goddess-Thalia at 82 weeks. Then you have three awards, without having to take a week off.
So if you continue every week until the year 2525, or whenever, you will have all the awards.
But if you take a week off, you still have to start from week 1 again and work back to Goddess, before you can get the double barrel awards.
But to modify all that. I also like the idea of an extra, special award at 52 weeks.
Does all that make any sense at all? It actually makes the Goddess-Calliope award the most difficult to get, which I thought was kind of nice since she is the easiest to get, first time around.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-14 04:00 pm (UTC)And Piksa has taken a lot of the burden, tagging entries so it's easier for me to grab stuff for the voting and taking over voting when I start to drown. I know there was a kerfuffle over at another writing community because it was daily, and the mod just didn't keep up, but I'm really lucky to have someone who jumps in there every time I start going under. She's been a godsend!
Wow... so under your plan, I will get awards at weeks 30, 57, 81, 102, 120, 135, 147, 156, 162, and 165 without stopping? Is that right? You really do collect them fast at the end but that's after 13 YEARS of doing prompts every week. *boggles*
no subject
Date: 2007-01-14 08:05 pm (UTC)This way, rather than having to work specifically for a preset award, I could decide which award I wanted, and collect the awards in whatever order I want.
If I miss a week, I'm back to the very beginning (non-Goddess awards).
I don't know if this differs much from other ideas stated above, but it seems like a less-restricted alternative to the, um, 13 year plan.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-14 08:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-14 08:22 pm (UTC)Example: You and I both write 39 weeks, and we want to cash in our 9 weeks for awards. I want a Goddess-9week award, and you want a Goddess-6week award AND a Goddess-3week award. You might be getting two awards, but we've still done the same number of weeks. Alternately, if you wanted to cash in 6 weeks and keep your other three, that's fine, because if you had just cashed in your 6 weeks as soon as you got them, you'd still be at 3, so there's no difference.
The main challenge would be keeping track of everyone's weeks. For that reason, it would be easier to say that we can only cash in the entirety of the weeks that we have. So, if we both write 39 weeks, we would have the option of either cashing it in for a Goddess-9week award, or continuing to accumulate weeks, no backtracking, no "bank account."
Either option is fine with me; it's just that the first one is significantly more work for whoever gets put in charge of keeping track of everyone's weeks.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-14 08:28 pm (UTC)So, it seems like it's about time for a poll.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-15 06:21 am (UTC)My only worry is that people won't cash in, and then what do you do at 60 weeks?
Maybe a combination? If you don't cash in you get the award at 57 weeks anyway and have to start from straight Goddess again?
no subject
Date: 2007-01-15 06:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-16 04:43 pm (UTC)Actually, it's only about 3 years, 2 months or so. 165/52
See? Much more feasible :P
(sorry, the math tutor in me couldn't not chime in)
no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 03:06 pm (UTC)I read your comment like three times... 3 years, yeah, and? And then I read what I wrote... 13 *facepalm*
I was actually boggling at 3, but 13... OH YEAH... that would be bad.